Comments for The Tenth Planet

Comment on The moon of Eris has a name also by chris

chris — Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:05:12 +0000

YES PLUTO IS A PLANET

Comment on 2003 UB313 Not a Planet by Alex

Alex — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:38:25 +0000

Darn it! I loved that Eris planet!

Comment on The moon of Eris has a name also by katie

katie — Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:52:41 +0000

wow i love it its amazing cant wait to learn more about it by the way is ploto a plant?

Comment on Xena is a dwarf planet by Jennifer

Jennifer — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:42:07 +0000

look, i believe this PLANET X is heading our way here in usa we can see soemthing large in our skys and it says on some sites its coming is this true or flase?

Comment on Xena is a dwarf planet by Laurel Kornfeld

Laurel Kornfeld — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 04:53:53 +0000

It’s not over. Pluto and Eris are planets, as are Ceres, Haumea, Makemake, and many others in our solar system, provided they orbit the sun and are large enough to be rounded by their own gravity. Only four percent of the IAU voted on the controversial demotion, and most are not planetary scientists. Their decision was immediately opposed in a formal petition by hundreds of professional astronomers led by Dr. Alan Stern, Principal Investigator of NASA’s New Horizons mission to Pluto. One reason the IAU definition makes no sense is it says dwarf planets are not planets at all! That is like saying a grizzly bear is not a bear, and it is inconsistent with the use of the term “dwarf” in astronomy, where dwarf stars are still stars, and dwarf galaxies are still galaxies. Also, the IAU definition classifies objects solely by where they are while ignoring what they are. If Earth were in Pluto’s orbit, according to the IAU definition, it would not be a planet either. A definition that takes the same object and makes it a planet in one location and not a planet in another is essentially useless. Pluto is a planet because it is spherical, meaning it is large enough to be pulled into a round shape by its own gravity–a state known as hydrostatic equilibrium and characteristic of planets, not of shapeless asteroids held together by chemical bonds. These reasons are why many astronomers, lay people, and educators are either ignoring the demotion entirely or working to get it overturned.

Comment on Tenth planet may really be the twelfth planet by xena

xena — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:06:05 +0000

omg it is my name hehehehe x

Comment on The moon of Eris has a name also by gian carlo

gian carlo — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:20:53 +0000

i will make news and projects about planets my teacher loves it

Comment on 2003 UB313 has a name – Eris by Fe-Fe

Fe-Fe — Tue, 26 May 2009 02:01:55 +0000

*To Geoddie* Check the article genius…

Comment on Tenth planet may really be the twelfth planet by Helper

Helper — Sat, 02 May 2009 03:40:33 +0000

Of course there are many planets like earth. Other humanities inhabit them. Our physical body and the devices we use are good only for the 3th dimension. There are many dimension above and many below. Other humanities may live in higher dimensions that we can not see. I found a free book that will teach you how to be able to explore all dimensions in the universe. You can ask for it at http://www.hercolubus.tv. No groups to joing, no money involved. Only you working to develop your powers. Good luck.

Comment on Planetary decision delayed until at least August, 2006 by whesu emmanuel mesoji

whesu emmanuel mesoji — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:23:33 +0000

Apart from the XENA planet is there any new scientific discovery of the century?